Re: postgresql and glusterFS
От | Alfredo De Luca |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql and glusterFS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAWpFTHpYx3nYe5E_EEhEaOyXf82vqemW1hcQo5WAfKHrEOgug@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql and glusterFS (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql and glusterFS
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
thanks everybody. I don't think we can use ceph (which I would prefere anyway) as we have already glusterFS for other stuff.
thanks heaps
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 12:05 PM Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
On 12/09/18 21:11, Prince Pathria wrote:
> Hey Alfredo,
>
> You can set up ceph as back end/data storage for postgres. Moreover
> you'll get a better community support as well.
>
I'd add a +1 for Ceph as opposed to Gluster. Great community support and
a better designed product.
Where I work, we run an Openstack Cloud with Ceph as the backing for the
block storage provider (Cinder). A number of customers use Postgres and
Mysql on this setup.
regards
Mark
Alfredo
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: