Re: Can we let extensions change their dumped catalog schemas?
| От | Jacob Champion |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Can we let extensions change their dumped catalog schemas? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAAWbhmgwCWR1GNQaYOPP=uCX2E_ZU9oPHaJhBvyUksnfgdF4bg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Can we let extensions change their dumped catalog schemas? (Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Can we let extensions change their dumped catalog schemas?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:18 PM Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com> wrote: > As a concrete example, Timescale's extension control file could look > like this: > > default_version = '2.x.y' > module_pathname = '$libdir/timescaledb-2.x.y' > ... > dump_version = true > > which would then cause pg_dump to issue a VERSION for its CREATE > EXTENSION line. Other extensions would remain with the default > (dump_version = false), so they'd be dumped without an explicit VERSION. Even more concretely, here's a draft patch. There's no nuance -- setting dump_version affects all past versions of the extension, and it can't be turned off at restore time. So extensions opting in would have to be written to be side-by-side installable. (Ours is, in its own way, but the PGDG installers don't allow it -- which maybe highlights a weakness in this approach.) I'm still not sure if this addresses Tom's concerns, or just adds new ones. We could maybe give the user more control by overriding the default version for an extension in a different TOC entry, and then add options to ignore or include those version numbers during restore. That doesn't address the side-by-side problem directly but gives an escape hatch. Earlier I wrote: > I'm curious about your > opinion on option 3, since it would naively seem to make pg_dump do > _less_ work for a given extension. This was definitely naive :D We can't just make use of the binary-upgrade machinery to dump extension internals, because it pins OIDs. So that might still be a valid approach, but it's not "less work." Thanks, --Jacob
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: