Re: PL/pgSQL 2
От | Joel Jacobson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAASwCXf0MPtKVFvj76HxjC1tAngGnCBSEKgu0Y0+9HQRu=eRMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I'm just saying it's much less probable you can add new features to >> plpgsql than to plpgsql2, as you have to take into account the risk of >> breaking compatibility. > > That's just a difference of one release. The release after the set of > problems is nearly identical. That's not true. The first release (plpgsql -> plpgsql2) will be a major release. After that, we can do minor releases for the following X years, until we possible need for a new major version. Each minor release would be guaranteed not to break any backwards compatibility. plpgsql -> plpgsql2 would be the single giant leap we take into the future. I think this reasoning is quite compatible with the versioning policy of the project in general, where we distinguish between major and minor releases.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: