Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start
От | Joel Jacobson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAASwCXeBAbU1qQz=RZSzg2k9Fpcn=hTgF4QPr1ny8RSgGeAh0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start (Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com> wrote: >> The difficulty with that is it'd require a gettimeofday() call for >> every wait start. Even on platforms where those are relatively cheap, I just realized how this can be optimized. We only need to set wait_start for every new waiting period, not for every wait start, i.e. not for every call to pgstat_report_wait_start(): Example: In pgstat_report_wait_start(): if (proc->wait_start == 0) proc->wait_start = (pg_time_t) time(NULL); And then in pgstat_report_wait_end(): proc->wait_start = 0; This means we only need to call time() or gettimeofday() once per waiting period. -- Joel Jacobson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: