Re: released savepoint blocking further statements
От | Miklós Fazekas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: released savepoint blocking further statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAMmcSTrhYA_wzExn0R8QCQo=mfqNxBirEm00rjZL2raDWk47g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: released savepoint blocking further statements (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Jeff,
Thanks much for your help. There was an issue with rails 5 beta connection pool where in some cases a connection with an open transaction returned to pool.
Regards,
Miklós
Miklós
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Miklós Fazekas <mfazekas@szemafor.com> wrote:
> [2.] I've tried to use the query Lock Monitoring wiki from to find out what
> is blocking:
>
> it shows that 79469 | RELEASE SAVEPOINT active_record_2_47 is the
> current_statement_in_blocking_process.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring
>
> SELECT bl.pid AS blocked_pid,
>
> a.usename AS blocked_user,
> ka.query AS current_statement_in_blocking_process,
> now() - ka.query_start AS blocking_duration,
> kl.pid AS blocking_pid,
> ka.usename AS blocking_user,
> a.query AS blocked_statement,
> now() - a.query_start AS blocked_duration
> FROM pg_catalog.pg_locks bl
> JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity a ON a.pid = bl.pid
> JOIN pg_catalog.pg_locks kl ON kl.transactionid =
> bl.transactionid AND kl.pid != bl.pid
> JOIN pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity ka ON ka.pid = kl.pid
> WHERE NOT bl.GRANTED;
That is probably not the current statement in the blocking process.
It is likely that the blocking process is in the state "idle in
transaction", and the RELEASE SAVEPOINT is actually the most recent
statement, not the current statement.
I've updated the wiki to clarify that, but it could use some more polishing.
So your savepoint release has executed successfully, but the outer
transaction is still holding on to locks which block the other
process. You have to convince that outer transaction to either commit
or rollback.
Cheers,
Jeff
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: