Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:36 PM Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> On 14.01.2025 22:51, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>
>
> There is a typo on committed vacuumlazy.c file
>  * If the TID store fills up in phase I, vacuum suspends phase I, proceeds to
>  * phases II and II, cleaning up the dead tuples referenced in the current TID
>  * store. This empties the TID store resumes phase I.
>
> Probably you meant phases II and III

Oops. Thanks for catching this. I'll fix that and the following
sentence in the main patch proposed in this thread to avoid extra
noise.

- Melanie