Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
От | Melanie Plageman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAKRu_ZJMFrO_tspzoX43h9NyEFS1nS438MoS3Yv7JxK3=jFPw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 3:27 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:40:09PM -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > I noticed in vacuum_rel() in vacuum.c where table_relation_vacuum() is > > called, 4211fbd84 changes the else into an else if [1]. I understand > > after reading the commit and re-reading the code why that is now, but I > > was initially confused. I was thinking it might be nice to have a > > comment mentioning why there is no else case here (i.e. that the main > > table relation will be vacuumed on the else if branch). > > This was a hack to avoid another level of indentation for that whole block > of code, but based on your comment, it might be better to just surround > this entire section with an "if (params->options & VACOPT_PROCESS_MAIN)" > check. WDYT? I think that would be clearer. - Melanie
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: