Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
От | amul sul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAJ_b97cyyM6n8smP7Zw8HOw49+=bH0HZH1q_p-NLyZtMH+WfA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:51 PM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:57 PM Alexander Korotkov [...] > > With this patch, to_date and to_timestamp behaving differently, see this: > > edb=# SELECT to_date('18 12 2011', 'xDDxMMxYYYY'); > to_date > -------------------- > 18-DEC-11 00:00:00 > (1 row) > > edb=# SELECT to_timestamp('18 12 2011', 'xDDxMMxYYYY'); > to_timestamp > --------------------------- > 08-DEC-11 00:00:00 -05:00 <=========== Incorrect output. > (1 row) > Sorry, this was wrong info -- with this patch, I had some mine trial changes. Both to_date and to_timestamp behaving same with your patch -- the wrong output, we are expecting that? postgres =# SELECT to_date('18 12 2011', 'xDDxMMxYYYY'); to_date ------------ 2011-12-08 (1 row) postgres =# SELECT to_timestamp('18 12 2011', 'xDDxMMxYYYY'); to_timestamp ------------------------ 2011-12-08 00:00:00-05 (1 row) Regards, Amul
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: