Re: Error-safe user functions

On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:08 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-12-09 Fr 10:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> >> On 2022-12-08 Th 21:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Yeah, I was planning to take a look at that before walking away from
> >>> this stuff.  (I'm sure not volunteering to convert ALL the input
> >>> functions, but I'll do the datetime code.)
> >> Awesome. Perhaps if there are no more comments you can commit what you
> >> currently have so people can start work on other input functions.
> > Pushed.
>
>
> Great!
>
>
> > As I said, I'll take a look at the datetime area.  Do we
> > have any volunteers for other input functions?
> >
> >
>
>
> I am currently looking at the json types. I think that will be enough to
> let us rework the sql/json patches as discussed a couple of months ago.
>

I will pick a few other input functions, thanks.

Regards,
Amul