Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
От | amul sul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAJ_b96Rn+mg+16opC-v1N9K6i1uk88JT30zs9mO7OHmDE-z8g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:41:15 +0900 > Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > >> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:03:58 +0530 >> amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > Updated patch attached. >> >> I looked into the latest patch (v13) and have some comments >> althogh they might be trivial. > > One more comment: > > + if (spec->remainder < 0) > + ereport(ERROR, > + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION), > + errmsg("remainder for hash partition must be a non-negative integer"))); > > The value of remainder is defined as Iconst in gram.y, so it never be negative. > Hence, I think this check is not necessary or Assert is enough. > Make sense, fixed this as well in the v14 patch. Thanks again. Regards, Amul
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: