Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command
От | Amul Sul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAJ_b95p69s7j=gZi6w6oqc7aZB0EXnoceUF4f7oaotdwa9beQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:56 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021, at 8:18 AM, Amul Sul wrote: > > The attached patch adds a small test for recovery_end_command execution. > > Additional coverage is always a good thing. > Thanks for the confirmation. > Currently, patch tests execution of recovery_end_command by creating > dummy file, I am not wedded only to this approach, other suggestions > also welcome. > > This test file is for archiving only. It seems 020_archive_status.pl is more > appropriate for testing this parameter. > Ok, moved to 020_archive_status.pl in the attached version. > Also, we don't have a good test for archive_cleanup_command as well, I > am not sure how we could test that which executes with every > restart-point. > > Setup a replica and stop it. It triggers a restartpoint during the shutdown. Yeah, added that test too. I triggered the restartpoint via a CHECKPOINT command in the attached version. Note that I haven't tested the current version on Windows, will cross-check that tomorrow. Regards, Amul
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: