Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
От | amul sul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAJ_b95g5AgkpJKbLajAt8ovKub874-B9X08PiOqHvVfMO2mLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit, Regarding following code in ATExecDropNotNull function, I don't see any special check for RANGE partitioned, is it intended to have same restriction for LIST partitioned too, I guess not? /* * If the table is a range partitioned table, check that the column is not * in the partition key. */ if (rel->rd_rel->relkind== RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE) { PartitionKey key = RelationGetPartitionKey(rel); int partnatts = get_partition_natts(key), i; for (i = 0; i < partnatts; i++) { AttrNumber partattnum = get_partition_col_attnum(key, i); if (partattnum == attnum) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION), errmsg("column \"%s\" is in range partition key", colName))); } } Regards, Amul
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: