Re: ALTER INDEX ... ALTER COLUMN not present in dump
От | amul sul |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER INDEX ... ALTER COLUMN not present in dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAJ_b95ERJaus8YV9rmC7v0wCqaOhpAYXqxKRC0PCRHphbbvJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER INDEX ... ALTER COLUMN not present in dump (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER INDEX ... ALTER COLUMN not present in dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:44 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 08:08:45AM +0000, Amul Sul wrote: > > dump-alter-index-stats-v2.patch looks pretty much reasonable to me, passing on committer. > > > > The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer > > Thanks Amul for the review. I got the occasion to look again at this > patch, and I have read again the original thread which has added the new > grammar for ALTER INDEX SET STATISTICS: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdsSYo6xpt0F=ngAdqMPFJJhC7zApde9h1qwkdpHpwFisA@mail.gmail.com > > As Alexander and others state on this thread, it looks a bit weird to > use internally-produced attribute names in those SQL queries, which is > why the new grammar has been added. At the same time, it looks more > solid to me to represent the dumps with those column names instead of > column numbers. Tom, Alexander, as you have commented on the original > thread, perhaps you have an opinion here to share? > Oh I see -- understood the problem, I missed this discussion, thanks to letting me know. > For now, attached is an updated patch which has a simplified test list > in the TAP test. I have also added two free() calls for the arrays > getting allocated when statistics are present for an index. Patch is missing? Regards, Amul
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: