Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От amul sul
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
Дата
Msg-id CAAJ_b953P4nO63oOs3nVJBiTMD9gOVsGCBc89HUcw=npN=Ka2A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning  (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
On 14 September 2017 at 09:58, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen
> <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amul,
>>
>> On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
>>>
>>> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.
>>>
>>
>> This patch needs a rebase.
>>
>
> Thanks for your note.
> Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head.
> Also added error on
> creating
> d
> efault partition
> for the hash partitioned table
> ,
> and updated document &
> test script for the same.

Sorry, but this needs another rebase as it's broken by commit
77b6b5e9ceca04dbd6f0f6cd3fc881519acc8714.

​
Attached rebased patch, thanks.

Regards,
Amul

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Haribabu Kommi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] utility commands benefiting from parallel plan
Следующее
От: Douglas Doole
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Add Roman numeral conversion to to_number