Re: BUG #6231: weird to_timestamp behaviour with out of range values
От | Henk Enting |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6231: weird to_timestamp behaviour with out of range values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAGvj=Dk0saKZtsaa3sjbk-u_w-ocOYpEUzZhFPW3bpVZAyHfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6231: weird to_timestamp behaviour with out of range values (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6231: weird to_timestamp behaviour with out of
range values
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > "Henk Enting" <h.d.enting@mgrid.net> writes: > >> I would expect the to_timestamp function to return an error when I feed > it > >> out of range values, e.g. months > 13 and days > 31. Instead it seems to > add > >> the surplus to the timestamp and then return it. > > > > What is your reason for using to_timestamp at all? The timestamp input > > converter is perfectly capable of dealing with standard formats like > > yyyy-mm-dd, and it does what most people expect in the way of data > > validation checks. > > Well, you might want to insist that the input is in some particular > format, rather than just "whatever the input function will accept"... > Exactly. But I probably can rely on the input function and set the datastyle parameter to make sure I get the right dates (e.g. in our case 07-04-2011is in april, not in july). But still, I think the to_timestamp should throw an error if I put in something like '21-21-2011'. Best Regards, Henk Enting
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: