Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow?
От | Alessandro Gagliardi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAB3BBLdJ2U2v9LJ-q6r5HUwzmoKavOukRuO4H=yVH1YcSvCdQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be
so slow?
Re: Why should such a simple query over indexed columns be so slow? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
You can do "SHOW random_page_cost" yourself right now, too.
4
I also tried "SHOW seq_page_cost" and that's 1.
Looking at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-RANDOM-PAGE-COST I wonder if I should try reducing random_page_cost?
Something that might help when it comes to advice on performance tuning is that this database is used only for analytics. It's essentially a partial replication of a production (document-oriented) database. So a lot of normal operations that might employ a series of sequential fetches may not actually be the norm in my case. Rather, I'm doing a lot of counts on data that is typically randomly distributed.
Thanks,
-Alessandro
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: