Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA8=A79iXsuiB822MUhaG=ss02XP8VeC6OafcFR=ZEt4oao_Aw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:27 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I would probably just have a few regression lines that should be sure >> to exercise the code path and leave it at that. >> > > I changed the regression tests to include a few more scenarios, basically > using multi-column indexes in different ways and they querying rows by > ordering rows in different ways. I did not take away the vacuum and I > believe it will actually help the tests by introducing some fuzziness in the > tests i.e. if the vacuum does not do its job, we might execute a different > plan and ensure that the output remains unchanged. > If we're going to keep the vacuums in there, do we need to add a wait barrier like Claudio suggested upthread? Once we decide on that I propose to commit this. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: