Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA8=A78RMC2SmabZMDb-A7rC3zAwLRr=W+cvPgZbiksZTmSguA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:01:53PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> I'm inclined to just ask them to stop running the animals on that >>> branch. There are no pre-existing users on 9.3 ppc64le, and new >>> customers hopefully won't move to 9.3. ISTM backpatching is riskier than >>> just changing a bunch of buildfarm configurations. >> >> +1 for dropping it. > > +1. If something like that were to happen for 10 or 9.6 knowing that > they still have four years to go, that could be debated, but just for 6 > months there is little benefit. I am in discussions with Mark, he's going to disable the animals from building 9.3. (by setting branches_to_build to 'HEAD_PLUS_LATEST4' instead of 'ALL'). cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: