Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA8=A7-BHHo-3Jd9bfa1M8ARZZkwv4ZafwXeS6ZVGoKx8MV62w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections onpostgres_fdw (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Superuser can permit passwordless connections on postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 12:56 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:17:20PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Yeah, it's sort of annoying that the buildfarm didn't notice this > > aspect of things. I'm not sure I want to spend cycles on checking > > it in every test run, though. > > > > Maybe we could have -DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS > > enable a check for that aspect along with what it does now? > > Makes sense to restrict that under the flag. Perhaps a catalog scan > of pg_authid at the end of pg_regress and isolationtester then? What's the preferred way to set that? "configure CPPFLAGS=-DENFORCE_REGRESSION_TEST_NAME_RESTRICTIONS"? Maybe I should add that to the sample buildfarm config ... cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: