Re: hot updates and fillfactor
От | Fabrice Chapuis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hot updates and fillfactor |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA5-nLCX8KV1tOL0BW9MkPrMtfV5jnfjJwysf4o=QVxPDgLFbg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: hot updates and fillfactor (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for your explanation and for the links
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:17 AM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
Hi Fabrice,
> I do not understand why hot_updates value is not 0 for pg_database? Given that reloptions is empty for this table that means it has a default value of 100%
Maybe I didn't entirely understand your question, but why would you
assume they are somehow related?
According to the documentation [1][2]:
pg_class.reloptions:
Access-method-specific options, as “keyword=value” strings
pg_stat_all_tables.n_tup_hot_upd:
Number of rows HOT updated. These are updates where no successor
versions are required in indexes.
The value of n_tup_hot_upd is not zero because there are tuples that
were HOT-updated. That's it. You can read more about HOT here [3].
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-class.html
[2]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/monitoring-stats.html
[3]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/storage-hot.html
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: