On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:23 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:35 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:01:34PM +0530, shveta malik wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 3:44 PM Bertrand Drouvot
> > > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Some random comments about v92_001 (Sorry if it has already been discussed
> > > > up-thread):
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback. The patch is pushed 15 minutes back.
> >
> > Yeah, saw that after I send the comments ;-)
> >
>
> There is a BF failure. See
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prion&dt=2024-02-22%2010%3A13%3A03.
>
> The initial analysis suggests that for some reason, the primary went
> down after the slot sync worker was invoked the first time. See the
> below in the primary's LOG:
>
The reason is that the test failed waiting on below LOG:
### Reloading node "standby1"
# Running: pg_ctl -D
/home/ec2-user/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/t_040_standby_failover_slots_sync_standby1_data/pgdata
reload
server signaled
timed out waiting for match: (?^:LOG: slot sync worker started) at
t/040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl line 376.
Now, on standby, we see a LOG like 2024-02-22 10:57:35.432 UTC
[2721638:1] LOG: 00000: slot sync worker started. Even then the test
failed and the reason is that it has an extra 0000 before the actual
message which is due to log_error_verbosity = verbose in config. I
think here the test's log matching code needs to have a more robust
log line matching code.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.