Re: pg_basebackup wish list
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Lx5jJWxtgC-6CavydCp32mWAzaKky=bSKc+GTdUt2jSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup wish list (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup wish list
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > Maybe I failed to parse his proposal. It's helpful if you elaborate it. > As per mail [1], it seems the proposal is not to use .tar for -Z 0. Now here actually we are on the fence, one can argue that if user doesn't want compression, he or she can use -F p (plain format). OTOH, without compression getting the backup as a single .tar file makes it simple to manage. I think there is some value in providing .tar for -Z 0, however in that case how should we define usage of -F p -Z 0? Shall we say with plain format -Z 0 gets ignored or throw error or do something else? If first, then I think it is better to mention the same in docs. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU%3D1zzj0et2x9fCqxMGJ6XP-FtMSUwtNQGwF01698FRWQ6uA%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: