Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1LvqBfNdoGO4YUZMOgcHg7Mi_9oVD2B5XJPtU_KTXLdew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 05:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I think it will make sense if we support RESET ALL as well similar
> > to Alter Database .. RESET ALL syntax. Do you see any reason
> > why we shouldn't support RESET ALL syntax for Alter System?
>
> Yes, that makes sense. I've added that in the attached version 2 of the
> patch.
> On 06/26/2014 05:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I think it will make sense if we support RESET ALL as well similar
> > to Alter Database .. RESET ALL syntax. Do you see any reason
> > why we shouldn't support RESET ALL syntax for Alter System?
>
> Yes, that makes sense. I've added that in the attached version 2 of the
> patch.
I think the idea used in patch to implement RESET ALL is sane. In passing
by, I noticed that modified lines in .sgml have crossed 80 char boundary which
is generally preferred to be maintained..
Refer below modification.
! values to the <filename>postgresql.auto.conf</filename> file. Setting the parameter to
! <literal>DEFAULT</literal>, or using the <command>RESET</command> variant, removes the configuration entry from
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: