Re: dropdb --force
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dropdb --force |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LuH2GcREcB2VDecp1bbyDh53M43nxZ8X2cg=mArOsd5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dropdb --force (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dropdb --force
Re: dropdb --force |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:15 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Attached patch has the fixes for the above comments. > I have pushed the refactoring patch. In the second patch, I have a few more comments. I am not completely sure if it is a good idea to write a new test file 060_dropdb_force.pl when we already have an existing file 050_dropdb.pl for dropdb tests, but I think if we want to do that, then lets move existing test for dropdb '-f' from 050_dropdb.pl to new file and it might be better to name new file as 051_dropdb_force.pl. I see that in some other cases like vacuumdb and clusterdb, we have separate test files to cover a different kinds of scenarios, so it should be okay to have a new file for dropdb tests. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: