Re: Logical replication timeout problem
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical replication timeout problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LoVa8rJ0nD3kyDMEc4ZmGWjjwDk+twSiz81ffMua5iXQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Logical replication timeout problem ("wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Re: Logical replication timeout problem |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 12:42 PM wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:54 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 7:18 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, shall we go back to the previous approach of using a separate > > > > > function update_replication_progress? > > > > > > > > Ok, agreed. > > > > > > > > > > Attached, please find the updated patch accordingly. Currently, I have > > > prepared it for HEAD, if you don't see any problem with this, we can > > > prepare the back-branch patches based on this. > > > > Thank you for updating the patch. Looks good to me. > Thanks for your review. > > Improve the back-branch patches according to the discussion. > Thanks. The patch LGTM. I'll push and back-patch this after the current minor release is done unless there are more comments related to this work. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: