Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Li1rBgX97ejrukttUE86HC5RkZ05MkTvJYkkJdGnuYZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> The argument elsewhere in this thread was that the reason for putting >> this in the connection options was so that you do *not* have to patch up >> every client to be able to use this functionality. If you have to add >> separate options everywhere, then you might as well just have a separate >> libpq function to initiate the session. > > Right, Andres was saying that we had to do both (special switches that > lead to calling a special connection function). Doesn't the new option 'standalone_datadir' (which is already in patch) a good candidate for special switch? How does having one more new switch helps better? With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: