Re: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LgAa0xocEaQg_dQ2SJvBf4w2mwEsYxU2rZRF1LZ6UXdw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber ("shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:52 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 8:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > v4-0002 looks good btw, except the bitpick about test comment similar > > > to my earlier comment regarding v5-0001: > > > > > > +# Change the column order of table on publisher > > > > > > I think it might be better to say something specific to describe the > > > test intent, like: > > > > > > Test that replication into partitioned target table continues to works > > > correctly when the published table is altered > > > > > > > Okay changed this and slightly modify the comments and commit message. > > I am just attaching the HEAD patches for the first two issues. > > > > Thanks for updating the patch. > > Attached the new patch set which ran pgindent, and the patches for pg14 and > pg13. (Only the first two patches of the patch set.) > I have pushed the first bug-fix patch today. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: