Re: Table refer leak in logical replication
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table refer leak in logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Le0=_btAf+MmTWpQb=ZVktoEMpAD+yt7nzaDuJ62+jiQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table refer leak in logical replication (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Table refer leak in logical replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:02 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:33:10PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:32 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > >> FWIW, I agree with fixing this bug of 1375422c in as least scary > >> manner as possible. Hou-san proposed that we add the ResultRelInfo > >> that apply_handle_{insert|update|delete} initialize themselves to > >> es_opened_result_relations. I would prefer that only > >> ExecInitResultRelation() add anything to es_opened_result_relations() > >> to avoid future maintenance problems. Instead, a fix as simple as the > >> Hou-san's proposed fix would be to add a ExecCloseResultRelations() > >> call at the end of each of apply_handle_{insert|update|delete}. > > > > Yeah, that will work too but might look a bit strange. BTW, how that > > is taken care of for ExecuteTruncateGuts? I mean we do add rels there > > like Hou-San's patch without calling ExecCloseResultRelations, the > > rels are probably closed when we close the relation in worker.c but > > what about memory for the list? > > TRUNCATE relies on FreeExecutorState() for that, no? > I am not sure about that because it doesn't seem to be allocated in es_query_cxt. Note, we switch to oldcontext in the CreateExecutorState. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: