Re: [PATCH TEST] Fix logical replication setup in subscription test `t/009_matviews.pl`
| От | Amit Kapila | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH TEST] Fix logical replication setup in subscription test `t/009_matviews.pl` | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1L_pDLpnguYpqqTF8obKKzHPFvqVHhgrVQvd5xM1djAnA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | RE: [PATCH TEST] Fix logical replication setup in subscription test `t/009_matviews.pl` ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: [PATCH TEST] Fix logical replication setup in subscription test `t/009_matviews.pl`
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 11:29 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Dear Amit, Ashutosh, > > > Thanks for the analysis. I think we should go with the simple patch > > proposed in this thread to improve this test and that too only for > > HEAD. > > To confirm, are you suggesting something like attached? It initially creates MVs > on both instances, then ensure REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW won't be replicated. > It also fixed the issue reported by Грем. > What difference REFRESH will make instead of CREATE? I think it is okay to just patch what is posted by the reporter in the first email [1] in this thread. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANV9Qw5HD7%3DFp4nox2O7DoVctHoabRRVW9Soo4A%3DQipqW5B%3DTg%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: