Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:31 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:10 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > The first two patches look mostly good to me. I have combined them
> > into one and made some minor changes. (a) Removed opt_two_phase and
> > related code from repl_gram.y as that is not required for this version
> > of the patch. (b) made some changes in docs. Kindly check the attached
> > and let me know if you have any comments? I am planning to push this
> > first patch in the series tomorrow unless you or others have any
> > comments.
>
> Thanks for the updated patch, patch applies neatly and tests passed.
> If you are ok, One of the documentation changes could be slightly
> changed while committing:
>

Pushed the patch after taking care of your suggestion. Now, the next
step is to rebase the remaining patches and adapt some of the checks
to PG-15.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.