Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:13 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:35 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > Also, adding wait sounds
> > more like a boolean. So, I don't see the proposed names any better
> > than the current one.
> >
>
> Anyway, the point is that the current GUC name 'standby_slot_names' is
> not ideal IMO because it doesn't have enough meaning by itself -- e.g.
> you have to read the accompanying comment or documentation to have any
> idea of its purpose.
>

Yeah, one has to read the description but that is true for other
parameters like "temp_tablespaces". I don't have any better ideas but
open to suggestions.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.