Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency.
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1LTdwUma_i9=s4-aSkeu+p1cfREMPh6mcayHncN+L=RaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency. (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency.
Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency. |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:58 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:18:35AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:56 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > > 3a9b18b309 didn't change the docs of pg_terminate_backend and whatever > > is mentioned w.r.t permissions in the doc of that function sounds > > valid for drop database force to me. Do you have any specific proposal > > in your mind? > > Something like the attached. > LGTM. > One could argue the function should also check > isBackgroundWorker and ignore even bgworkers that set proc->roleId, but I've > not done that. What is the argument for ignoring such workers? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: