Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LSMcBV3GzJEaUqBAeP6_ZBOqzk-HSCxV=iR1b1oBjwVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Index Scans
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was going to do it after index and index-only scans and parallel > bitmap heap scan were committed, but I've been holding off on > committing parallel bitmap heap scan waiting for Andres to fix the > simplehash regressions, so maybe I should just go do an update now and > another one later once that goes in. > As you wish, but one point to note is that as of now parallelism for index scans can be influenced by table level parameter parallel_workers. It sounds slightly awkward, but if we want to keep that way, then maybe we can update the docs to indicate the same. Another option is to have a separate parameter for index scans. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: