Re: row filtering for logical replication
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LPh+KCALU1Eo4itWq+bYU6NzUGr4dwypMynM3Skjvv5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: row filtering for logical replication (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: row filtering for logical replication
Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:33 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:42 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 10, 2021, at 5:19 AM, Peter Smith wrote: > > > > AFAIK this is the latest patch available, but FYI it no longer applies > > cleanly on HEAD. > > > > Peter, the last patch is broken since f3b141c4825. I'm still working on it for > > the next CF. I already addressed the points suggested by Amit in his last > > review; however, I'm still working on a cache for evaluating expression as > > suggested by Andres. I hope to post a new patch soon. > > Is there any ETA for your new patch? > > In the interim can you rebase the old patch just so it builds and I can try it? > I have rebased the patch so that you can try it out. The main thing I have done is to remove changes in worker.c and created a specialized function to create estate for pgoutput.c as I don't think we need what is done in worker.c. Euler, do let me know if you are not happy with the change in pgoutput.c? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: