Re: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN()
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LNwXYTOaQOnP4iNgNJfuFSFbr5Tp0Sv-j1OwayPBPRdw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN() (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 8:51 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 1:12 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Why do we need to move send_relation_and_attrs() call? I think it > > doesn't matter much either way but OTOH, in the existing code, if > > there is an error (say 'out of memory' or some other) while building > > the map, we won't send relation attrs whereas with your change we will > > unnecessarily send those in such a case. > > That's a good point. I've reverted that change in the attached. > Pushed. > > I feel there is no need to backpatch v6-0002. We can just make it a > > HEAD-only change as that doesn't cause any bug even though it is > > better not to send it. If we consider it as a HEAD-only change then > > probably we can register it for PG-15. What do you think? > > Okay, I will see about creating a PG15 CF entry for 0002. > Thanks! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: