Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LNht44gB+7Ww07w8KLMOdw2dBrRvvgG=BtG8unnDw=jw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug ("Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes@amazon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:55 PM Jameson, Hunter 'James' <hunjmes@amazon.com> wrote: > > Hi, I ran across a small (but annoying) bug in initializing parallel BTree scans, which causes the parallel-scan statemachine to get confused. > > > To reproduce, you need a query that: > > > > 1. Executes parallel BTree index scan; > > 2. Has an IN-list of size > 1; > > 3. Has an additional index filter that makes it impossible to satisfy the > > first IN-list condition. > > > > (We encountered such a query, and therefore the bug, on a production instance.) > > I think I can understand what you are pointing out here but it would be great if you can have a reproducible test case because that will make it apparent and we might want to include that in the regression tests if possible. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: