Re: WAL prefetch
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL prefetch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1LGJr0-Qag05nfFmNO-06c-f+z5Aon3rFQDmR1yY5Jn_Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL prefetch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I have tested wal_prefetch at two powerful servers with 24 cores, 3Tb NVME >>> RAID 10 storage device and 256Gb of RAM connected using InfiniBand. >>> The speed of synchronous replication between two nodes is increased from 56k >>> TPS to 60k TPS (on pgbench with scale 1000). >> >> That's a reasonable improvement. > > Somehow I would have expected more. That's only a 7% speedup. > It might be due to the reason that there is already a big overhead of synchronous mode of replication that it didn't show a big speedup. We might want to try recovery (PITR) or maybe async replication to see if we see any better numbers. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: