Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1L=hFb7pspUfNCpG_vhx3N9Gh3irAnNm92NbETUWHS4Fg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:36 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > Few other comments which I have not fixed: > + /* interface function to support parallel vacuum */ + amestimateparallelvacuum_function amestimateparallelvacuum; /* can be NULL */ } IndexAmRoutine; One more thing, why have you removed the estimate function for API patch? It seems to me Robert has given a different suggestion [1] to deal with it. I think he suggests to add a new member like void *private_data to IndexBulkDeleteResult and then provide an estimate function. See his email [1] for detailed explanation. Did I misunderstood it or you have handled it differently? Can you please share your thoughts on this? [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmobjtHdLfQhmzqBNt7VEsz%2B5w3P0yy0-EsoT05yAJViBSQ%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: