Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1L=35hLXQkqWL98VuqJ_OhRcv70a9D2BXfUOJYzhfJHBQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/23/16 1:56 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: >> which comment are you referring here? hashm_mapp contains block >> numbers of bitmap pages. > > The comment I'm referring to says > > The blknos of these bitmap pages are kept in bitmaps[]; nmaps is the > number of currently existing bitmaps. > > But there is no "bitmaps" field anywhere. > Okay. You are right, it should be hashm_mapp. >> In the above code, it appears that you are trying to calculate >> max_avail space for all pages in same way. Don't you need to >> calculate it differently for bitmap page or meta page as they don't >> share the same format as other type of pages? > > Is this even useful for hash indexes? > I think so. It will be helpful for bucket and overflow pages. They store the index tuples similar to btree. Is there a reason, why you think it won't be useful? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: