Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1L6VZ9Ei3fombco9HS8btALL7N2yzJQoFh+_L5_EUQ1Cw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE
protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 12:11 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: >> If an application wants to allow these connection parameters to be >> used, it would need to do PQenableStartServer() first. If it doesn't, >> those connection parameters will be rejected. > > Stupid idea: Would it work that we require an environment variable to be > set before we allow the standalone_backend connection parameter? That's > easy to do, easy to audit, and doesn't require any extra code in the > individual clients. This is certainly not a stupid idea, rather something on similar lines has been discussed previously in this thread. Tom has suggested something similar, but I am not sure if there was a conclusion on that point. Please see the relavant discussion at below link: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17384.1346645480@sss.pgh.pa.us I think the basic question at that time was why should we consider an environment variable more safe. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: