Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1L6BGb9BaK929Z2Z40F6Hr=0r=UhQthDFidKXf73doiqw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:18 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned by me a few days back that the first patch in this series is ready to go [1] (I am hoping Tomas will pick it up), so I have started the review of other patches Review/Questions on 0002-Immediately-WAL-log-assignments.patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. This patch adds the top_xid in WAL whenever the first time WAL for a subtransaction XID is written to correctly decode the changes of in-progress transaction. This patch also removes logging and applying WAL for XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT which might have some effect. As replay of that, it prunes KnownAssignedXids to prevent overflow of that array. See comments in procarray.c (KnownAssignedTransactionIds sub-module). Can you please explain how after removing the WAL for XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT, we will handle that or I am missing something and there is no impact of same? 2. +#define XLOG_INCLUDE_INVALS 0x08 /* include invalidations */ This doesn't seem to be used in this patch. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JM0%3DRwODZQrn8DTQ3dbcb9xwKDdHCmVOryAk_xoKf9Nw%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: