Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1L4sYatnVmkwBomVMy_ff39OBh4QKwqa0inqLcH8_e8sg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov >> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> > Hackers, >> > >> > originally this idea was proposed by Andres Freund while experimenting >> > with >> > lockfree Pin/UnpinBuffer [1]. >> > The patch is attached as well as results of pgbench -S on 72-cores >> > machine. >> > As before it shows huge benefit in this case. >> > For sure, we should validate that it doesn't cause performance >> > regression in >> > other cases. At least we should test read-write and smaller machines. >> > Any other ideas? >> > >> >> may be test on Power m/c as well. > > > Good idea. I don't have any such machine at hand now. Do you have one? > Yes, I can help in testing this patch during CF. Feel free to ping, if I missed or forgot to do same. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: