Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 3:28 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 3:16 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One more thing we may want to think about is what if there are tables
> > created by extension? For example, I think BDR creates some tables
> > like node_group, conflict_history, etc. Now, I think if such an
> > extension is created by default, both old and new clusters will have
> > those tables. Isn't there a chance of relfilenumber conflict in such
> > cases?
>
> Shouldn't they behave as a normal user table? because before upgrade
> anyway new cluster can not have any table other than system tables and
> those tables created by an extension should also be restored as other
> user table does.
>

Right.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.