Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Kq3+GsM429kCcCEPGzn6vEYP=f--ENTei1qGfYUocbpQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 8:58 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:45 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Sawada-San, I would like to go ahead with your > > "Use-HTAB-for-replication-slot-statistics" unless you think otherwise? > > I agree that it's better to use the stats collector. So please go ahead. > I have pushed this patch and seeing one buildfarm failure: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mandrill&dt=2021-04-27%2009%3A23%3A14 starting permutation: s1_init s1_begin s1_insert_tbl1 s1_insert_tbl2 s2_alter_tbl1_char s1_commit s2_get_changes + isolationtester: canceling step s1_init after 314 seconds step s1_init: SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('isolation_slot', 'test_decoding'); ?column? I am analyzing this. Do let me know if you have any thoughts on the same? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: