Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Kj055MkY2Lk3PJDF8TQ_FDzst6MKCwxEOJM=an2zBRRA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command
Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:08 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 09:29 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > The idea is to support two_phase via protocol with a subscriber-side > > work where we can test it as well. The code to support it via > > replication protocol is present in the first patch of subscriber-side > > work [1] which uses that code as well. Basically, we don't have a > > good > > way to test it without subscriber-side work so decided to postpone it > > till the corresponding work is done. > > Thank you for clarifying. > > Right now, it feels a bit incomplete. If it's not much work, I > recommend breaking out the CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT changes and updating > pg_recvlogical, so that it can go in v14 (and > pg_create_logical_replication_slot() will match > CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT). But if that's complicated or controversial, > then I'm fine waiting for the other work to complete. > I think we can try but not sure if we can get it by then. So, here is my suggestion: a. remove the change in CreateReplicationSlotCmd b. prepare the patches for protocol change and pg_recvlogical. This will anyway include the change we removed as part of (a). Does that sound reasonable? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: