Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1Ki9+OpHbYXgxZM6X7BEQga_AZsEXp6odLDhODQ-NTkvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:05 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So, I think we need to open the file in binary mode as in other parts >> of the code. The attached patch fixes the problem for me. >> >> Thoughts? > > > Yikes. Yes, I believe you are correct, and that looks like the correct fix. > > I wonder why this was not caught on the buildfarm. We do have regression tests for it, AFAIK? > I am not able to find regression tests for it, but maybe I am not seeing it properly. By any chance, you have removed it during revert of ""Allow on-line enabling and disabling of data checksums". -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: