Re: Bump default wal_level to logical
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bump default wal_level to logical |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KcSexCbM0zjg=r_Se2wKXzaY8Qy6=-kbb3HbFJdAASOg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bump default wal_level to logical (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bump default wal_level to logical
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 10:08 AM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to propose $subject, as embodied in the attached patch. This > makes it possible to discover and fulfill a need for logical > replication that can arise at a time when bouncing the server has > become impractical, i.e. when there is already high demand on it. > I think we should first do performance testing to see what is the overhead of making this default. I think pgbench read-write at various scale factors would be a good starting point. Also, we should see how much additional WAL it generates as compared to current default. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: