Re: row filtering for logical replication
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KZ+N=vfgqeUuZfRLRC+WyNBFvU9Ei7kF-7OPXnTX2WrA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: row filtering for logical replication ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: row filtering for logical replication
RE: row filtering for logical replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:29 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > On Tues, Nov 23, 2021 2:27 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:04 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > PSA new set of v40* patches. > > > > Few comments: > > 1) When a table is added to the publication, replica identity is checked. But > > while modifying the publish action to include delete/update, replica identity is > > not checked for the existing tables. I felt it should be checked for the existing > > tables too. > > In addition to this, I think we might also need some check to prevent user from > changing the REPLICA IDENTITY index which is used in the filter expression. > > I was thinking is it possible do the check related to REPLICA IDENTITY in > function CheckCmdReplicaIdentity() or In GetRelationPublicationActions(). If we > move the REPLICA IDENTITY check to this function, it would be consistent with > the existing behavior about the check related to REPLICA IDENTITY(see the > comments in CheckCmdReplicaIdentity) and seems can cover all the cases > mentioned above. > Yeah, adding the replica identity check in CheckCmdReplicaIdentity() would cover all the above cases but I think that would put a premium on each update/delete operation. I think traversing the expression tree (it could be multiple traversals if the relation is part of multiple publications) during each update/delete would be costly. Don't you think so? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: