Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KUcuQdxfQj=rmSHzVMP6WFg6sjVPtDJrha=ySLWVKZAw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >> Option 3 >> -------- >> >> BR, AR delete triggers on source partition >> BR, AR insert triggers on destination partition. >> >> Rationale : >> Since the update is converted to delete+insert, just skip the update >> triggers completely. > > +1 to option3 > .. > Earlier I thought that option1 is better but later I think that this > can complicate the situation as we are firing first BR update then BR > delete and can change the row multiple time and defining such > behaviour can be complicated. > If we have to go by this theory, then the option you have preferred will still execute BR triggers for both delete and insert, so input row can still be changed twice. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: