Re: A question about wording in messages
От | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A question about wording in messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAA4eK1KTH+G-oQSEe_5+wdM+b9qZSZqkqarOJCg5dLrPDE8Nhg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A question about wording in messages (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 7:45 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > I saw the following message recently modified. > > > This controls the maximum distance we can read ahead in the WAL to prefetch referenced data blocks. > > Maybe the "we" means "PostgreSQL program and you" but I see it > somewhat out of place. > > I found other three uses of "we" in backend. > > > client sent proto_version=%d but we only support protocol %d or lower > > client sent proto_version=%d but we only support protocol %d or higher How about just replacing 'we' with 'server'? > > System allows %d, we need at least %d. > Another possibility could be: "System allows %d, but at least %d are required." > This is a little different from the first one. In the three above, > "we" suggests "The developers and maybe the PostgreSQL program". > > Is it the right word choice as error messages? I'm not confident on > the precise wording, but I think something like the following are > appropriate here. > > > This controls the maximum distance to read ahead in the WAL to prefetch referenced data blocks. > > client sent proto_version=%d but only protocols %d or lower are supported > > client sent proto_version=%d but only protocols %d or higher are supported > > System allows %d, at least %d needed. > This could be another way to rewrite. Let us see if others have an opinion on this. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: